By Evan B. Lipstein
In the wake of super storm Sandy many NYC residents are still struggling to get their properties up and running.
The storm shut off the lights and flooded basements that were equipped with generators designed to offer redundancy to light the property’s hallways and common areas.
Owners are now tasked with re-examining their buildings’ safety systems. Everyone should be thinking not only about backup power and emergency lighting, but also the idea of what system redundancies and other methods might be used to improve safety.
While costly generators are being installed, even small investments can make a major improvement.
Building owners are well advised to look into photoluminescent egress guidance systems to help improve safety for building occupants.
When there is an emergency such as smoke or power outage, people evacuating can become confused, disoriented and sometimes panic. In emergency situations the first response is to quickly move people from danger to safety quickly.
Using photoluminescent “glow-in-the-dark” Emergency Exit Signs and Emergency Pathway Marking systems and Low-Level photoluminescent Exit Signs will reduce confusion and panic.
Photoluminescent safety signs help to save lives by clearly illuminating the path to exits and safety, and they can be installed at a relatively low cost.
The photoluminescent glow-in-the-dark phenomenon comes from rare earth mineral crystals found in nature that have the unique capacity to absorb and store energy from ambient light.
When the lights dim or go out, the absorbed light energy is released, and the crystals emit a luminous glow. The glow commences automatically without any human, mechanical or electrical intervention.
A typical photoluminescent system calls for a combination of signs, strips and directional symbols strategically placed where they can be easily seen by building occupants and visitors.
Photoluminescent pathway markings define all evacuation routes and provide visual guidance for safe, rapid, orderly egress.
Unfortunately inequality is the status quo. Not all high-rise buildings are created equal — commercial office towers have far more safety requirements than residential towers; and with condo high-rises all around the city, that lack of emergency preparedness could be costly, even deadly.
Building safety code requirement differences were partially addressed with the adoption of Local Law 26, which revised the buildings codes for high-rise office properties in 2004; But these safety laws don’t address all the challenges that residents could face in a high-rise residential building.
It should now be obvious that blackouts and fires are non-discriminatory events. Shouldn’t all people in NYC have the same safety benefit in any / all high-rise structures? If a person must evacuate a building it should not be just the high-rise office workers that can get out safely. It is also important to point out that the majority of fire tragedies that kill people often occur in the most economically challenged neighborhoods of the city.